Invariances: The Structure of the Objective World by Nozick, Robert

Belknap Press: An Imprint of Harvard University Press. paperback. Good. 6x1x9. Nice good condition overall spotless pages binding strong minor cover wear see pictures attached

Harvard University Press, 2003. This is an ex-library book and may have the usual library/used-book markings inside.This book has soft covers. In good all round condition. Please note the Image in this listing is a stock photo and may not match the covers of the actual item,700grams, ISBN:9780674012455

Paperback / softback. New. Nozick rethinks and transforms the concepts of truth, objectivity, necessity, contingency, consciousness, and ethics. Using an original method, he presents new philosophical theories that take account of advances in physics, evolutionary biology, economics, and cognitive neuroscience, and casts current cultural controversies in a wholly new light.

paperback. Good. Access codes and supplements are not guaranteed with used items. May be an ex-library book.

Belknap Pr, 2003. Paperback. New. 432 pages. 8.75x5.00x1.00 inches.

Harvard University Press. New. Special order direct from the distributor

Belknap Pr, 2003. Paperback. New. 432 pages. 8.75x5.00x1.00 inches.

Belknap Press: An Imprint of Harvard University Press, 2003-10-15. Paperback. New. New. In shrink wrap. Looks like an interesting title!

Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press. New. 2003. Hardcover. 0674012453 .*** FREE UPGRADE to Courier/Priority Shipping Upon Request *** - *** IN STOCK AND IMMEDIATELY AVAILABLE FOR SHIPMENT - 432 pages. IMPORTANT: An extremely clean copy with no marks to the interior pages, no writing or underlining. Pages are intact and tight to the spine. From a review by Steve Fuller which appeared in ISR: Interdisciplinary Science Reviews: "Nozick's fundamental insight into the relationship between science and philosophy concerns their shared interest in explanation. For Nozick, `an explanation shows something to be less contingent than it otherwise appears' (p. 153). The intuitive appeal of this definition rests on a fairly commonsensical notion of what it means to 'understand' something, namely, we see how its existence or occurrence makes sense in light of other things we know. Notice that this notion straddles two extreme views of what philosophers call `the modal structure… Read More