Imagination and Interpretation in Kant: The Hermeneutical Import of the Critique of Judgment by Makkreel, Rudolf a - 1995

University of Chicago Press, 1995. Paperback. Good. Pages can have notes/highlighting. Spine may show signs of wear. ~ ThriftBooks: Read More, Spend Less.Dust jacket quality is not guaranteed.

University of Chicago Press. Used - Good. Former library book; may include library markings. Used book that is in clean, average condition without any missing pages.

University of Chicago Press, 1990. Very good trade paperback. Inscription on half title.. Trade Paperback. Very Good.

University Of Chicago Press, 1995-03-01. Reprint. Paperback. Used:Good.

Paperback / softback. New. In this illuminating study of Kant's theory of imagination and its role in interpretation, Rudolf A. Makkreel argues against the commonly held notion that Kant's transcendental philosophy is incompatible with hermeneutics. The charge that Kant's foundational philosophy is inadequate to the task of interpretation can be rebutted, explains Makkreel, if we fully understand the role of imagination in his work. In identifying this role, Makkreel also reevaluates the relationship among Kant's discussions of the feeling of life, common sense, and the purposiveness of history.

Univ of Chicago Pr, 1994. Paperback. New. reprint edition. 195 pages. 9.25x6.25x0.75 inches.

Univ of Chicago Pr, 1994. Paperback. New. reprint edition. 195 pages. 9.25x6.25x0.75 inches.

University of Chicago Press, 1995-03-01. Paperback. New. New. In shrink wrap. Looks like an interesting title!

University of Chicago Press. Paperback. New. 9x6x0. Brand New Book in Publishers original Sealing

Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. As New. 1995. Paperback. 0226502775 .*** FREE UPGRADE to Courier/Priority Shipping Upon Request *** – – *** IN STOCK AND IMMEDIATELY AVAILABLE FOR SHIPMENT - Text pristine, unmarked - 195 pages. Book description: In this illuminating study of Kant's theory of imagination and its role in interpretation, Rudolf A. Makkreel argues against the commonly held notion that Kant's transcendental philosophy is incompatible with hermeneutics. The charge that Kant's foundational philosophy is inadequate to the task of interpretation can be rebutted, explains Makkreel, if we fully understand the role of imagination in his work. In identifying this role, Makkreel also reevaluates the relationship among Kant's discussions of the feeling of life, common sense, and the purposiveness of history. -- with a bonus offer-- .