The Catcher in the Rye, or Not?

The Catcher in the Rye, or not?
The Catcher in the Rye, or not?

Seen here at left is the iconic book jacket for J.D. Salinger’s 1951 novel, The Catcher in the Rye, featuring E. Michael Mitchell’s angry red horse illustration — or is it? Upon closer inspection, you will note that this Catcher‘s author is Richard Prince. And the publisher’s name on the spine is no longer that of Little Brown, but instead something called American Place.

In 2011, Richard Prince, an artist whose paintings have sold at auction for millions of dollars, created this reproduction of the first edition of Catcher in a limited edition of 500 copies.

It was an act of “provocative appropriation,” according to Swann Galleries, which will auction one of the now scarce artist’s books on November 18, for an estimated $800-1,200. Prince sold unsigned copies at the 2011 New York Art Book Fair for several hundred dollars and–unbelievably–hawked them one day on a sidewalk outside New York City’s Central Park for $40. You can read more about this stunt at the Poetry Foundation’s blog.

Image Courtesy of Swann Galleries.

Browse related collectible books:

First Editions of Catcher in the Rye

Richard Prince’s “Catcher in the Rye”

Reprinted with permission from Fine Books & Collections, author

Get a discounted subscription to Fine Books & Collections on Biblio!

Sign up for the Fine Books & Collections free email newsletter.

Rare Finds are a special feature from Biblio and the wonderful writers at Fine Books & Collections. Visit their site to see more about the rare book trade.

This entry was written by and posted on November 17, 2014 at 7:22 pm, filed under Rare Finds and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink

3 Responses to “The Catcher in the Rye, or Not?”

  1. Ed Austin

    I have a hardcover edition (Bantam Books) of Drums Along the Mohawk by Walter D. Edmonds. The leather cover though incorrectly lists the author as James Fenimore Cooper. Does this type of error make my book valuable as well?

  2. Amy Carpenter

    I’m a little confused here. What’s the difference between “Provocative appropriation” and plagiarism? Copyright infringement? What (if anything) has Mr. Prince done to make his version of the original “transformative”, and to justify his profiting from another’s creative work?

  3. Cord

    I don’t get it. Is this blatant plagiarism masquerading as “art”? What did the Salinger estate do about it?


Leave a Reply